Month: November 2009

  • Girlfriend Rules: Simple, Short, and Smart

    These are my rules regarding how my future girlfriend/fiance/wife should treat me:

    1. No cheating
    2. No bitching
    3. No wasting my money if she is rich enough already to afford everything she can possibly get for herself
    4. No fucking around with other guys
    5. No bullshitting
    6. No lying to her parents, or manipulating other people, including myself
    7. Has had no more than 1 or even no boyfriend in the past
    8. Is understanding
    9. Is loyal
    10. Is trustworthy
    11. Is committed for the long term, not just another random, "fling."

    If a girl cannot fit any of these criteria, they are not worth my time.

    In regard to myself:

    1. Be less of a jerk
    2. Be loving
    3. Be understanding
    4. Less defensive...(it depends)
    5. Be more sympathetic
    6. Play hard to get
    7. Be a nerd
    8. Be more socially active...somehow (vague, but, meh)
    9. Be more cautious of who I can actually trust
    10. Challenge a bitchy girlfriend should I do find one...that is actually bitchy
    11. Do not let myself to be taken advantage of, cheated on, manipulated, or given an ultimatum by a girl. Be assertive.

    My rules and her rules are simple. K.I.S.S.

     

     

  • Most people don't read = are blind

    So, I just got one of my articles featured on datingish...and it looks like 99% of the readers never got the message about the relationship between language and how we perceive reality. Common sense, logic, and reasoning has been cast aside for, "political correctness" because nobody wants to offend anyone. Yeah, "it is a crime to offend people now!" That is right - that is the perception I got from most of the commentators after my article got published.

    People were like, "what is wrong with the term, 'significant other?'" even when I provided them the answer in plain sight near the end of my essay. It does not take a freaking genius to figure out how stupid, dumb, and pathetic political correctness has become. They are literally blind to my last few sentences. My last few sentences were the answers to all of their comments and questions.

    However, I did sort of like the British term for lover: partner! It is somewhat more accurate, and more precise, although one concern of mine is how it fails to define which gender the partner is...

    So, my over all analysis of the comments? I was somewhat disappointed at the general response. Most people are just blind, and stupid to the obvious answers in my last blog.

    Screw Political Correctness!

     

    P.S. If you feel offended, too bad. This is a free country, after all, right?

     

     

  • Love: Politically Correct Edition

    You all heard that saying, "significant other," well, my question is - which other? I know a lot of, "other" people aside from myself, but which others? And how are those, "others," "significant?" if neither, "significant," nor, "other" are defined?

    Well, I suppose then all my teachers I have ever had are my, "significant others" because well, they are others, and they were significant, or are significant because they teach me stuff. Isn't that legitimate enough?

    So, what is wrong with calling the person you love, the person you are actually in a relationship with, "lovers?" Or, some other love-related term, like, "my babe..." or, "my sweetheart..." or, "my boyfriend/girlfriend..." Are not those terms more accurate and precise? I mean, what makes, "others" so, "significant," that we fail to define exactly what either of those two words in the phrase mean?

    Is love so forbidden and unmentionable, even embarrassing that we resort to such silly terms like, "significant other?" Are we so immature and childish we need to take away the, "offensiveness" of love itself? What if one day, hypothetically, love is no longer called, "love?" Instead, it is called, "sudden plusgood emotional outpourings?" That is right, "sudden plusgood emotional outpourings!" And what about the term, "couple?" Well, we can easily make that term more politically correct by saying it is simply a, "strong comradeship" could we not? And how about the term, "sex" (the act) - "semi-automatic-manual double production!" And what about sex, the biological term itself, "manufactured external-internal production mechanism!" How about a politically correct term for, "marriage:" Permanent unpaid contract! Also - how about a politically correct term for the word, "family?": collective common comradeship! How about a term for romance too - because in the future, we may not want to be offensive to women, since romance implies something to do with men instead of women: mechanical stimulation and simulacrum! How about a term for break-up, and being dumped? Ungood comrade communication syndrome! And courtship...dating? Camaraderie bondship! How about, "making out?" doubleplusgood surplus mechanical interaction!

    At what point does any and all political correctness just become a form of manual, monotone language - devoid of emotions, feelings, and life itself? Imagine - language devoid of meaning, essence, truth, and honesty.

    My point is, this whole political correctness thing in regard to love, relationships, and marriage is taking away the life out of life, and the love out of love, and the relationship out of relationships.

    What do you, my dear readers think? Has this whole, "significant other" thing gone too far? And should we just call each other what we really are when we are in a relationship - girlfriend, boyfriend, lover, etc?

    Why do we have this politically correct term in regard to to "love?"  

    Thank you

     

     

     

  • Dreams...what do they mean?

    Now, this is going to be weird, but last night, for some odd reason or another, I had a strange dream about my ex...again. This is like the third time or something I have had a dream about my ex...and she keep on bothering me on a psychological and psychic level...and so, I need some answers. That is why I am writing this entry...to find some possible answers about my state of mind...and my psychic state...because I do not really know what is going on here...any and all advise would be helpful...including interpretations...

    Well, basically, the dream goes like this:

    The first dream started with her Xanga being reactivated again. So, it was kind of weird...and I don't know how that happened...then, suddenly this shit happened...For no reason whatsoever, I don't know how or why, me and my ex just happened to ge together again, and we seem to be having fun like the way we used to...talking, sharing, and discussing good old days...at least, that is what it felt like. She looked beautiful in that dream last night, and I don't even feel weird when I was with her...everything was normal. It was a sunny day in that dream too. I felt normal, although right afterwards, I felt weird. I was talking with her normally, like I always used to. I wasn't angry either. I was just having a causal talk with her...and then, she was talking to me about all the good stuff in her life, and we were having the time of our lives. We were smiling too. We were also pretty close. Then, somehow, gradually, the dream faded away...and that was last night.

    My other dream was not like this - in the other one, my ex was stalking me. She told me to meet up with her in her neighborhood. I went, but then as I was walking along the dark street, I saw her dad's car, and she apparently brought some other people along too, to apparently, "convince" me that I had to go to see her. I was weirded out, and freaked out. So, I ran away, and walked away from the situation. Then, that was the end of that one...as creepy and stalkish as that one was...

    Then, the one that was so long ago...that one took place while she, my ex was emotionally and physically torturing me...or both. I don't know what happened, but as we were talking, I felt like I was being mutilated even cut open inside out...it was a strange feeling. It felt painful too. I did not understand what was happening, but I knew that in that dream, or nightmare, I was hurt, angry, and frustrated at her. She was evil in that dream. She was shouting at me, and acted like some kind of psychotic, mindless bitch from Hell. She was never what I ever anticipated her to be. She justified her action in that dream by saying she was better than me or something, or that her interests were above all others. I was angry, and hurt...emotionally and physically by the vicious energy of the attack. I was basically psychically assaulted by me ex. I didn't understand. The last thing I said to her in despair and agony was, "How could you do this to me???" This dream took place just before I spoke to her again on February 2, 2009 for the last time. On the 33rd day of the year...the day of shadows and rebirth...apparently.

    So, I ask my dear readers...what is the meaning of all these dreams? My memories may have been messed up a little, but based on whatever I remembered...what does it all mean? I don't mind sharing by the way...it helps me clear up the mess and the chaos...so, an explanation anyone?

     

    Thanks

     

    Xinyu Hu

     

    P.S. Me and my ex broke up over the fact she cheated on me (my POV), and she has since then, called me evil, and a faggot. She chose to fuck someone else after we fucked within 24 hours. She called it casual sex when I asked her about it, and she said she'll never speak to me again because of it. The break up took place at the end of October 2008, and was formally over by December 27. I tried to salvage it again on February 2nd. The friendship between me and my ex lasted for 3 years and 3 months in total. Five months before she gone out with someone else, we broke up. Then, for five months, we did the "friends with benefit thing." We started going out in January, and ended in May of 2008. Just some background information. And yes, I became really angry and ticked off after she started dating some new guy she met on a bus to school one day. This is all necessary background information for you to analyze the dreams and if possible, tell me what the heck do they mean exactly. And yeah, I am a single child. Lonely, and it sucks.

     

     

    Thank you.

     

  • Lonely, bored, and frustrated...

    These days, I am so fucking frustrated...because I really don't have anyone to hang out with...and when I do...I don't even know how to begin a decent conversation...

    Yeah, I have been having a hard time living with myself recently...especially as the day are going by so slowly, and it is a dread to have to wake up knowing that today is the same as yesterday, and that tomorrow is going to be the same...and it is just awkward.

    I read so much, and yet I have so little friends. I am just depressed with the way things are. I landed in this position not even because of something I did. I got into this position because things were beyond my control. So, why is everyone else complaining? Why?

    I hate being lonely, being ostracized, and lost...sure, I have F.A.C.E.I.T, my numerous blogs, and a few friends I hang out with with on some occassions...but really, I am alone. Nobody really takes the forum that I made for role play seriously, and so, I am forced to do things all by myself. I am just so different from everyone else, and so - anxious for company, things are so unjust.

    That is my rant for today...

     

    Xinyu Hu

     

     

     

  • My blogger.com blogs...

    http://objective-political-analysis.blogspot.com/

    http://sacredsynchromysticshamanism.blogspot.com/

    http://neoearth33.blogspot.com/

    These are my three other blogs. The first one is for political purposes. Also for economics and such.

    The second one is about symbolism in popular culture and how they relate to our lives...because, believe it or not, symbols do have an impact to our lives...hint: souls.

    The third one is related to a role playing forum based on civilization building The nations or civilizations should represent the player. Anyone is free to join.

     

    Please visit each of the above sites, and tell me what you think, and offer critiqes, encouragement, and commentary. I need you guys to participate. Join the forum for example.

     

    Please.

     

    Xinyu Hu

     

  • Why we don't need golf

    I love George Carlin's routine on golf and homeless people. So, I naturally agree with his analysis of the pathetic nature of golf.

    1. Golf is for arrogant, elite, bourgeoisie, white, rich, Anglo-Saxon white men, "sport."

    2. It has a ball about an inch in width

    3. You play the game with a twisted stick

    4. You drive around a "clean green lawn" to pick the ball that is white, and has weird hexagon shapes all over it

    5. The golf course itself is hundreds of acres long and thousands of acres and hectares on some of the best land on the Earth and or USA/North America

    6. "Business" deals can be discussed anywhere, not necessarily on a golf course

    7. The reason why there are so many homeless people is because they need a HOUSE...to live in...and places to work at - close to where they live.

    8. What is more important: rich white guys playing golf or resolving the homeless issue?

    9. For those who think that mini golf is better - well, they can go screw themselves too

    10. I am not a hypocrite because I am not white, and I am not rich, and I do not play golf...

    11. Golf is GAY - it is a boring sport to watch, let alone play. No intellect required. Just hit a fucking ball and go and get it. Simple - any stupid person can do it.

    So, do you agree that we should do away with golf, and solve the homeless issue first and foremost?

    P.S. GOLF IS A FUCKING ELITE SPORT.

     

    Your comments and criticism are welcome...

     

     

     

  • A Third Party Platform and How to Achieve It

    America is in need of a radically different Third Party that could oust the corrupt, outdated Two Party system...which is simply controlled chaos and managed opposition. It is simply the age old trick of the Hegelian Dialect of Thesis - Antithesis - Synthesis.

    So, what is the platform of this Third Party?

    The most important thing first is to get back monetary control from the unconstitutional Federal Reserve. All their assets should be seized. Their Board of Governors would be subpoenaed. Their accounts would be audited on behalf of the public interest. Then, we need trials for these private bankers. We should also return to a gold standard for the ease of monetary control and management.

    Next, we need to get out of the wars, cut back military spending, reduce the size of the Armed Forces, and reduce the size of the Federal Government. Mass protests by many at military bases and recruitment centers would be necessary. All soldiers should be shipped back home from foreign bases. All USA military bases should be shut down. All corporations that are involved in military contracts should be put out of business immediately. Their assets and profits should be redistributed. Their directors and CEOs would also be put on trial. Desertion, protests, and civil disobedience would be crucial.

    Then - we need to cut back on our taxes, and impose a flat tax on sales of as low as possible for the sake of investing that money (with no interest incurred, and debt-free) to do public services.We, the people would also need to have the right to bear arms in this process. So, I suggest soldiers returning home smuggle weapons to their neighborhoods to their families and teach them how to operate military weapons to be used against government troops.

    The ultimate action we can all take at this moment is mass emails to congressmen, representative, and president that we, the people will rise against them in mass numbers in the streets if they do not do what we tell them to do.

    End the war.

    End the Fed.

    End debt.

     

     

    P.S. "You" are the Third Party - That is, "We the People" not "We the privately funded American Empire Third Party for Continued American Dominance World Wide"

     

     

     

  • The Military-Industrial Complex: Future Wars Inc

    This is the future of warfare for America, and this is the plans of the Corporate Racket that dominates American foreign and domestic policy:

    1.Robotic warfare - using robots to engage in warfare in distant regions of the planet to keep the world, "safe for democracy"

    2. System-based warfare: using satellites and surveillance to defeat enemies

    3. Full spectrum dominance: cyberspace warfare against, "rogue states" and other "undesirable" who stand in the way of American world domination

    4. Future Soldiers - soldiers of the future will be able to go invisible, have better, stronger armor and defences

    5. "Non-lethal" weapons - acoustic, heat, microwave

    6. Space based combat - Star Wars International for American dominance in the 21st century and beyond

    7. "War for Peace" doctrine - when we talk about war, we are really talking about peace

    8. Network centric warfare: computers, AI, robotics, soldiers, and central command all connected through a central database to coordinate all kinds of random "attacks" against, "terrorists" and other undesirables who are enemies to American dominance and hegemony

    9. American hegemony = Global government by Global Elite

    10. War is Peace

    11. Kiss good bye to your freedoms

     

     

     

  • The three things that kill (metaphorically and literally) and how to solve it

    The three things that kill us long before we are even born is the following:

    1. Taxes: the most burdensome activity that all working people pay to their government and bankers

    2. War: Death by Patriotism

    3. Corporatism: The reason why the two above exist

    I. Taxes: To solve this problem the ordinary hard working American and citizen of any country should stop paying their Federal Income Tax; force an audit on the Federal Reserve Bank, subpoena the Board of Governors, eradicate all private central banks, audit all merchant and investment banks, put all bankers and investors on trial; ensure all funding for each of these activities come from the local treasury of a small community of approximately 1000 people (hence, lots of senators and representatives). All bankers, investors, speculators (the risiculously rich one's who make millions or hundreds of thousands) would be tried before a jury of 300 citizens who have been chosen by their local consituency based on those 300 citizens knowledge of justice, economics, and truthfulness.

    Another issue are "charities," "religious institutions" and "labor unions" - I suggest they all should be taxed, audited on a yearly basis (for free of charge by voluntary accountants and auditors who will be unbiased, honest, truthful, and transparent). Charities should be audited and taxed to keep them accountable to the public. Religious institutions would also be taxed because they are getting rich off of other people's hardworking earnings. All religions, no exceptions, would be taxed to death according to the people's wishes. Religion should NOT ask for money in the first place if they do not want to be taxed. There is a special case regarding the Catholic Church though: once they have been audited and taxed, and start to be held accountable, they must release all texts hidden in their vaults to the public domain. Nothing will remain hidden. In the case of government and military intelligence files: they must all be declassified and be immediately released to the public; no exceptions; no exemptions.

    As to the question of what would happen if one person were to work twice as hard as another and earn twice the money. In that case, if the person had indeed worked hard, they keep their earnings and income. Just get audited - often. Also, getting yourself audited should be free of charge. Hey, we don't like wasting taxpayer money.

    II. War: Before a war can be declared; 30 days before that all the richest people from government, banking, arms manufacturers, arms dealers, and CEOs will be asked to be the first to conscript. This is regardless of their AGE, SEX, RELIGIOUS AFFLIATION, or anything "irrelevant." If they are too rich for their own good, fuck it. They deserve it. If they want war, let them fight in the front lines - being paid the same as anyone else - trained in brutal bootcamps, and required to go through the same conditions as any ordinary soldier. If they refuse, they can be taken off to jail for "treason." Simple punishment for hypocrisy and outright "manipulation" of the public.

    Next, during this time, there would be a plebiscite on whether or not war should be declared. Only those who are qualified to fight (except the above bankers, corporate financiers, and swindlers) will be allowed to vote. Of course the bankers and rich would want to go to war to make richers - therefore, they must not have any say in the PEOPLE's vote. If  the people vote no, there is no war.

    Finally, if war is declared - the rich suckers will be the first one's to be killed as they will be leading the charges. Also, during war time, no civil liberties will be compromised. During wartime, the property of the private central bankers, corporations, and rich fucks will be given to the public as public domain.

    All of the above three steps will be explicitly stated and enforced by the will of the people.

    III. Corporatism: This may sound like a "communist" or even an "anarchist" solution to the two above problems. Basically, the solution lies in the people forming communities of approximately 1000 each who elect one of their own as a representative to Capitol city for six months. Each person will get a turn at office and politics. Also, all corporations will be chartered for a temporary amount of time; their profits given off the public, and audited constantly by the people by volunteers. All corporate business operations will be regulated by workers - everyone will be paid the same, as in - anywhere ABOVE the poverty line (but by then, there would be no such thing as poverty and hunger in the world). Everyone will be paid the same, and everyone will sit on a council that decides how the company is to be run, and also be involved with the community (however you define community - your neighborhood for example).

    The working class will not be taxed. The Middle class (if it still exists - maybe people who own assets in the 100 000 to 999 999 range) will be taxed only 0.5%. All banks, corporations, and institutions (think tanks, unions, businesses, religions) will be taxed to the bone for as long as they function. Bailouts and salvaging or rewarding corrupted or failed institutions of any kind would be illegal. Money therefore, would be in the public domain, and there would be no debt, no interest rates, no war, and no poverty. Call it a "classless" society...but class is a concept and a reality that will always exist to some degree or another.

    With these three steps, the world can be a better place.

     

    Disclaimer: I am neither a communist, an anarchist, a socialist, a hardcore capitalist, a neo-liberal, a neo-Con, or an Atheist. I do not endorse any one religion in particular, nor do I support any private corporation. I am an individual, and I, while a working class member and from a Middle class family loves his freedoms, and would like to fight for it. That is why he wrote the above.

     

    P.S. Liberty - Freedom with Responsibility - on an individual level.